Status of Negotiations on 15 June 2012 Friday afternoon almost at the 
closing of the Third Session of Negotiations in Rio
Although negotiators and UN staff keep saying in the corridors this 
Friday that negotiations on the Rio+20 outcome document (“The Future We Want”) 
are advancing, and that we are in the right direction, in reality the opposite 
is happening here.  In most splinter 
groups each paragraph is meticulously negotiated and the discussion often gets stuck on the choice of quite 
words. Some criticize that the choice of words makes no difference for the final 
outcome, while others sustain that each word counts as they will be the basis 
for action.  Rumours are beginning to 
spread that the way the negotiations evolve it is becoming unlikely that a final 
document can be adopted by consensus.
What would happen if countries do not reach an 
agreement?
In case no agreement is reached on the final document, Brazil as the 
host country could use the option of tabling an alternative text to be signed by 
all UN Member States. 
This scenario is splitting opinions in the corridors as some are 
beginning to think that this might be the only way to “save” Rio+20, while 
others find this option rather risky since, in case the Host´s text is rejected, 
there would be no time left to craft an alternative.  With several ministers arriving in Rio and 
with the G20 Summit in Los Cabos  ready 
to start (after which most Heads of State will fly straight to Rio)  tension is building up.
In the daily press confererence today, Brazil´s chief negotiator 
Ambassador Luiz Alberto Figueiredo strongly denied that Brazil is working on an 
alternative text.  However, he made it 
clear that in case negotiations stall, Brazil will suggest alternative language 
for the most contentious paragraphs. 
No comments:
Post a Comment